I have been doing a little more research pertaining to NH DCYF and the NH Court's and just for the heck of it decided to read through the Protocols Relative to Abuse and Neglect. Under Protocol 7 ISSUES FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER AT THE ADOPTION HEARING,
No.2, I read the Judge has to ascertain that the appeal process has expired. I know in my granddaughter Isabella's case, there was a pending appeal when the Judge granted her adoption to the stranger's.
No.4, the Judge is supposed to review the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). There is no way of my family knowing if he did. I'm sure Nashua DCYF kept it a secret that both Isabella and Austin are part Indian. EX CPSW Anna the Homewrecker was well aware of our Indian heritage, yet the Indian Council was NEVER notified. Just a little more deceit used against our family by the almighty DCYF.
No. 5, confirm that the adoptive parents have been advised of Medical background's on the child's parent's, Religion and Ethnicity. Put it this way, they don't have a clue. DCYF didn't even know half of my daughter's medical condition's. Hence, there was NO investigation before Isabella was stolen. For that matter, they have NO clue as to ALL the medical conditions of our family and past generation's. Isabella's Ethnic background has been denied since the beginning. The Ex CPSW told my daughter NOT to tell anyone that Isabella is half Dominican. Hmm, I wonder why. I'm sure the strangers know by now. Why should Isabella be denied the right to know her true ethnicity? I'm sure she isn't being raised Catholic either. The ex CPSW was well aware from the start my daughter wanted Isabella baptized Catholic, but refused to let us get her baptized.
No. 6, ensure that adoptive parents understand that adoption is permanent and irreversible. Sorry to have to inform you, but this isn't true. An adoption CAN be reversed due to fraud, in which there was plenty of fraud in Both Austin's and Isabella's cases, and extraordinary circumstances. I take that to mean any one of the many deceitful practices used to steal my grandchildren.
No.7, any other information the court deems necessary. I wonder if DCYF told the Judge everything about the stranger's before granting adoption of Isabella and her recently adopted half sister's. I doubt it, but then again, the Judge is just as deceitful as DCYF.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COURT
COURT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
IN COOPERATION WITH
THE FAMILY DIVISION
AND
N.H. PROBATE COURT
LINK
Revised April 2003
PROTOCOL 7 ISSUES FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER AT THE ADOPTION HEARING
At the adoption hearing, the judge shall review the petition and all documents and should:
(1) confirm that the court has proper jurisdiction;
(2) ascertain that parental rights have been voluntarily relinquished or that parental rights have been terminated and that the appeal process for the latter has expired;
(3) ensure that any consents to adoption are provided, pursuant to RSA 170-B:5, including the consent of the person to be adopted when that person is twelve (12) years of age or older;
(4) review the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA);
(5) confirm that the adoptive parents have been advised, pursuant to RSA 170-B:15,III-b, based on information that is reasonably available at the time, of information on the age, medical and personal backgrounds of the birth parents and the child to be adopted. Such information may include, but is not limited to, the ethnic and religious background, as is reasonably known;
(6) ensure that adoptive parents understand that adoption is permanent and irreversible; and
(7) any other information the court deems necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment